MoreQ&A About Divorce and Family Law
Reviewing
other people's questions and commonly observed legal fact patterns is a great
way to get educated about your own case.
In this episode of Divorce Team Radio Todd Orston, Partner at the
Divorce and Family law firm of Meriwether & Tharp, LLC, answers legal
questions that may just provide you with the answers you need to properly
protect yourself in court.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
Welcome everyone to Divorce Team Radio, sponsored by the
divorcing family law firm of Merriweather and Thorpe. I'm your host, Todd
Weston, and here you're going to learn about divorce, family law, and from time
to time even tips on how to save your marriage if it's in the middle of a
crisis. If you want to read more about us, check us out
online@atlantadivorceteam.com. Alright, let's get started. So periodically we
will do shows about people's questions. I mean we talk about the issues all the
time, but people have specific questions every day. People call Merriweather
and Thorpe, they have questions, we try to give them answers, information they
can use so they can make good decisions. Well, sometimes we will do these shows
where we take the questions and put them on the show and some of these are from
Georgia. Some of the questions that you're going to be hearing are from other
states.
(01:09):
Understand that when I'm talking about the law, when I am
talking and answering questions and giving information relating to the law
we're talking about here in Georgia. Now there are a lot of similarities from
state to state, but, and this is a big gigantic and my kids are probably going
to laugh at that comment, but anyway, this gigantic but is that if you're not
in Georgia, you need to contact an attorney in your area. You need to ask a
question of an attorney who practices in your state and maybe even in your just
specific area where you live, who might have a better familiarity with the
judges and how things are handled in your particular area. So again, we're
going to answer these questions and let's start with this one. The question is,
how do you regain custody of your child when temporary or an emergency custody
order was entered and custody was given to a family member?
(02:24):
The question goes on to say five years ago, my son's
grandparents filed for emergency temporary custody because I was temporarily
living at a hotel and it was given to them, no court hearing, no investigation,
nothing. They just knocked on my door and they were like, Hey, basically we
have custody of your child. Main question is, how do I go about regaining
custody of my son? Do I need to file some sort of paperwork with the courts?
Alright, well first of all, I'm sorry it happened. Second of all, I'm glad you
are finding yourself in a position where you are more because that's what the
court is going to be looking at the order in question, and again, I don't have
it in front of me, so my assumption would be that what happened was some kind
of an emergency motion was filed with a court here in Georgia would be with the
juvenile court more than likely, and basically an emergency order was entered
that established a guardianship because the child was basically in need of care
because of your personal issues.
(03:35):
A judge found that there was an emergency situation that
required a third party to be given guardianship. Now, guardianship, what is
that? Guardianship is basically saying, okay, I recognize that you're the mom,
I recognize you're the dad, but there are issues here and sometimes it's a
voluntary situation. Parents recognize that they cannot provide for a child and
they will look to a third party and voluntarily consent to a guardianship.
Sometimes as in this situation, it's not voluntary, but clearly there was an
issue and so this guardianship was put in place and it in essence gave legal
rights that otherwise a third party would not have, right? They're not a
parent. So a guardianship basically says, okay, you are now a legal guardian.
You have all of the rights that a parent would have to contact doctors and deal
with the medical issues to contact teachers, deal with coaches, get records in
essence to do everything that a parent would do that is needed to take care of
this child. So assuming that the order in question is a guardianship order,
what can you do? Can you snap your fingers and it just goes away? It's not that
simple. And here in Georgia actually it used to be a little more simple, but
now I can tell you right now you need to file a petition with the court to
terminate the guardianship and unfortunately you're going to be fighting a kind
of an uphill battle.
(05:36):
If the court was concerned enough that it entered this
order, maybe even without you being there and gave this third party
guardianship, that means there's a deep concern about a child's welfare when in
your custody. So you would need to file this with the court to terminate the
guardianship. And what you need to do absolutely is you need to be prepared,
prepared to show the court that the person that the court was concerned about
is no longer the same person. The concerns are no longer or should no longer be
of concern, whatever the issue might be. If it was drugs, if it was alcohol, if
it was criminal behavior, whatever you have gotten stable, you have a job, you
are able to provide food and care for the child. You are ready to step up and
be the parent that child needs. If you're not ready to do that, then you're
probably not going to be successful in getting that order set aside.
(06:51):
So that is how generally speaking, you're going to regain
custody of your child. You're going to do everything you can to address the
concerns of the court that led to the issuance of that order and then be ready
to go into court and say, I'm different, I'm better, I'm stable, and I'm ready
to basically give that child the love and the care that he or she needs.
Alright, so here's another question. Different issue, not talking about
guardianships anymore. Question is, can I get in trouble for contacting my husband's
mistresses husband? Say that one more time. Can I get in trouble for contacting
my husband's? If you want to write this down, maybe some bar graphs or
whatever. I know a bar graph wouldn't be, anyway, you know what I'm joking
about, but can I get in trouble for contacting my husband's Mistress's husband?
Question goes on to say my husband cheated on me five years ago with a woman he
works with.
(08:00):
I forgave him and we attended counseling to help our
situation in the process. I found out she was married as well. Years have
passed and I just recently found out I feel like I'm Casey Caso like, and I
just recently found out that they have been seeing each other again. I'm
currently looking getting choked up to file a divorce, but I feel pity for her
husband as he has no clue it happened the first time, nor does he know it's
happening again, I don't know him personally, but I do have means to contact him.
Would I get in legal trouble if I reached out to him? Alright, well are you
going to get in legal trouble? Let me ask the, or rather answer the question,
you're going to get in trouble. Well, you're not going to jail for reaching out
to this person. You're not getting charged with anything for contacting that
person and spilling the proverbial beans.
(09:03):
But maybe that's not what this person is asking. If that's
not what the person is asking, it's not just an issue of will I get in legal
trouble, then maybe the question is, will the judge in my case look down on be
upset with that behavior? So it may be necessary to reach out if you need, for
instance, if you need to prove, let's say your spouse is saying didn't happen,
it's not happening. Well, it may be necessary to depose that woman. It may be
necessary to depose the husband. The husband's therefore going to find out. But
you need to make sure that it doesn't look like you're just being spiteful.
You're just doing something to cause harm. If there's a valid reason, then it
may be necessary. But if you have an attorney, you should definitely be working
that into the overall strategy. So if you do it and when you do it, it's done
in a way that again, doesn't look like you're just scorched earthing it.
(10:15):
You're just trying to cause pain on whomever and if you
need to have a conversation with that person, so be it. There have been plenty
of cases where we worked with someone and they came and they had already done
it and on one hand with fingers left over, I can tell you where, or I can count
where there were situations where nothing happened, judge didn't get upset,
whatever. At some point the judge may just ignore that and look at it like,
well sir, you took your chances you had this affair and unfortunately people
found out. Alright, well when we come back we're going to go into some more
questions like how do you basically terminate a father's rights? We'll be right
back.
Speaker 2 (11:05):
I just wanted to let you know that if you ever wanted to
listen to the show live, you can listen at 1:00 AM on Monday mornings on WSB,
so you can always check us out there as well.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
Better than counting sheep, I guess, right? That's right.
You can turn on the show and we'll help you fall asleep.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
There you go. I'll
Speaker 1 (11:23):
Talk very off.
(11:28):
Welcome back everyone to Divorce Team Radio, a show
sponsored by the family law firm of Meriwether and Tharp. I'm your host Todd,
and if you want to read more about us, check us out
online@atlantadivorceteam.com. And if you want to read transcripts or listen to
shows, again, you can find them@divorceteamradio.com. So today I'm answering
questions, legal questions people have. We already talked about regaining
custody when there's, I believe a guardianship that has been granted to a third
party and we answered the question of can I get in trouble for contacting my
husband's Mistress's husband? Well, what about this question?
(12:13):
Question is, if I wanted to get my child's dad's rights
removed, what would my chances be? There was physical abuse during my
pregnancy. He never helped me with her, doesn't buy things she needs to
survive. And when he comes around once a week, he sits on his phone and watches
what's on TV and hardly interacts with her. She doesn't really know him as a
dad. I have him on child support. I have photo evidence of the abuse and plenty
of receipts I've saved of the things I've provided. So let's go back to the question.
If I wanted to get my dad's rights removed, let's use the proper term that I
think this is what the person is asking. How can I terminate the rights of the
father and what would my chances be? So based on these facts, I would tell you
this, the chances are incredibly low Termination of rights is that's a very
drastic and final solution when it comes to custody issues. Courts don't like
to terminate the rights of a parent even when someone has zero contact.
(13:44):
But here, and I am not forgiving physical abuse, I'm not
saying that's okay in any way, shape or form, but based on what I'm reading,
there was physical abuse during my pregnancy. Okay, so that's historic. I mean
that's in the past and since then he comes by once a week to visit. Is he
winning Dad of the year awards if he's sitting there on his phone or watching
TV or doing something? No, he's not, but he is making an effort. So while his
chances of winning, let's say primary custody are probably slim to none, the
chances of you terminating his rights are also slim because there is evidence
that he is making an effort and the evidence that you are relating or referring
to relating to past physical abuse, well unfortunately, if you were that
concerned, the court could look at it this way, that if were that concerned,
why have you allowed there to be not only contact, but it sounds like the
contact happens at your home because the court's going to be like, well, okay,
there was abusive behavior and since then you allow this person into your home
to visit weekly and it looks like or sounds like he's exercising that time.
(15:18):
So terminating the rights, I believe based on these facts
would be incredibly difficult. Termination is really going to be reserved for
those situations where there is, I mean a lot of criminal behavior, very severe
drug addictions and things of that nature. And even before the rights are
terminated, the judge may just simply say, if there's a custody order in place,
I'm not terminating the rights, but right now mom is going to have sole legal
and physical custody. Father won't have any contact right now, but that's not a
termination. A termination, there's no coming back from it. The rights have
been terminated, being awarded sole legal and physical custody, meaning that
the other side is not having any contact. You can come back from that, like I
was saying before, get stable, show that you're healthier, show that the things
that a court was concerned about are no longer present, are no longer affecting
you and therefore affecting a child and then what was taken away can be given
back.
(16:41):
So to answer the question again, chances wouldn't be good,
it would not. But maybe what you need to be doing is looking at the kind of
contact he's having and if you're not comfortable with him exercising,
parenting time in your living room, fine, put a stop to that. But understand if
you're doing that because you like the fact that you can see what's going on,
well if you put a stop to that, then unfortunately if he pushes the issue of I
still want contact, then that means the contact will be occurring outside of
your presence, outside of your home.
(17:29):
So pick your poison, but it does sound like he's putting
forth minimal, albeit minimal effort and therefore a court probably would allow
him to continue to try and make some effort. Alright, how about this? Another
question, is it legal to give up my rights to a child? So this is sort of a
follow-up kind of question because it's dealing with termination. Question goes
on to say a girl has a child, I've never been a part of the child's life and
now the mother wants me to be a part of the child's life and I don't see myself
being a part of that child's life.
(18:24):
Alright, well I mean look, it's not for me to judge. I get
it. I'm not walking in your shoes, but the bottom line is there's a child out
there and as much as I would like to say it would be great for the child to
know his father or her father, that's up to you. And if you just don't see
yourself being able to put forth the effort and make the effort to not only
have contact but to become a meaningful part of the child's life, okay, well at
least you understand what your limitations are, but is it legal to give up your
rights?
(19:18):
The answer to that is sort of like a termination. Can
rights be removed? Yes. Can you just wake up and say, you know what, I've never
been a part of the child's life, don't want that. So therefore I am going to
just voluntarily give up rights. I'm going to sort of unilaterally terminate my
own rights and thereby terminate any obligation I might have to help provide
for the child. The answer is no. Here in Georgia, there very specific rules
relating to termination. Can't just say, well, I don't want to be a part of the
child's life and therefore I'll sign whatever document. Here you go, here's a
consent termination order and I'd no longer have any obligation that would need
to be approved by the court. And I can tell you, I have seen many situations
where there's not another person stepping into your shoes like a stepparent
adoption where judges have said, okay, I get it, mom, you agree he should not
be involved.
(20:34):
Dad, you agree, you don't want to be involved and guess
what? You brought a child, both of you into this world, sir, it is your
responsibility and until someone steps into those shoes, I'm not terminating
your rights. So it is definitely possible for you to have zero legal rights,
zero custodial rights, no contact, and the court is still going to look to you
to be financially responsible. So if that's the case and if that's the mother's
angle that hey, you need to start being responsible and she's doing it, I think
kind of the right way, basically not just saying, just start paying me money,
but hey, why don't you get involved? Jump in, but I need financial help. But if
you want to have a relationship, well, you're just going to have to decide. If
you know you're going to be financially responsible, you might as well work on
that relationship. I think I can safely assume you're going to have a child who
at some point will greatly appreciate your involvement. Alright, when we come
back, we're going to keep going with these questions and we're going to talk
about someone who has sole legal and physical custody and basically has a
question about that other party who has major drug issues now saying that
they're ready to take custody of the child even though maybe some of those
behaviors haven't gone away. We'll be right back.
(22:21):
Hey everyone, you're listening to our podcast, but you
have alternatives, you have choices. You can listen to us live also at 1:00 AM
on Monday morning on WSB.
Speaker 2 (22:32):
If you're enjoying the show, we would love it if you could
go rate us in iTunes or wherever you may be listening to it. Give us a five
star rating and tell us why you like the show.
Speaker 1 (22:48):
Welcome back everyone to Divorce Team Radio. I'm Todd
Orton, partner at the law firm of Merriweather and Tharp. If you want to read
more about us, check us out online@atlantadivorceteam.com. If you want to read
transcripts or listen to shows, again, divorce team radio.com. Today I'm
answering questions, legal questions that people have posted about family law
matters, things like can I contact my husband, husband's mistresses, husband,
termination of rights, parenting rights. Alright, so the next question, this
person writes that I have sole legal and physical custody. I was granted sole
custody with the only caveat being I get to choose when our child sees the
other parent. That's it. This is because the mother has or had a drug problem,
was homeless and didn't have a job. So after about five to six months, she's
seeking full custody from me, which of course I refuse to give her.
(23:58):
I and the grandmother have been jointly co-parenting our
child and the child therapist and psychologist have noted our child is actually
doing better under eye and the grandmother's care. No more physical or mental
signs of distress. What are the chances the court will give her full custody or
even joint custody when she has this history of being unstable drug use, et
cetera. There's a lot to unpack there kind of custody issues are always
potentially complicated and there are so many issues that come up, things that
a judge can and will look at. But let's sort of break this specific example
down here. There is, I'm making some assumptions, but there was clear evidence
that the mom was not stable. The mom had a drug issue and because of that, this
father was able to convince the court to give him sole legal and physical
custody. And this is sort of like what I was talking about. It is kind of a
step before termination. It's basically saying, look, you are so unstable, you
don't need to have any contact with this child and you definitely aren't going
to have any say in terms of how the child is being raised.
(25:32):
That's the sole part. So we have a situation where the
father was the more stable parent, contacted the court, filed the necessary
paperwork, brought the mother's behavior and concerns about the behavior to the
court's attention, and the court agreed and said, mom, you're out of control.
You need to deal with your own health issues, drug problem, et cetera. So five
months later, mom is now ready to say to the court, I'm better. A lot of
problems there and if the mother was listening and if I was speaking to the
mother, I can tell you right now, I'd be looking at that person going, you need
a little more, more of a track record, healthy track record to show that those
problems are truly behind you. We've all heard and maybe we all understand,
addiction doesn't just go away. Courts recognize that, so you got some help,
great, fantastic.
(26:51):
But if your expectation is that you are better and if you
go into court taking the position, I'm better and I'm the mom and I'm ready to
be and I want to be the primary physical custodian. Again, if that's the
position you're taking, I will put it this way. I fully believe that is not
going to be successful. The concerns about drug use are still there. The court
isn't just going to assume that you have beaten this addiction and there is no
chance of potentially falling off that wagon. The court's going to want to see
a little bit more time go by. Now does that mean you can't do anything? No. Six
months in, I definitely would be having a conversation with an attorney about
whether or not you can look to the court and ask for some change to the sole
custody terms. If you have no contact, maybe it's time for you to have contact.
What does that contact look like? Does it have to be supervised?
(28:14):
Be ready also to show the court that you are prepared and
willing to do whatever it takes to put the court's mind at ease about those
concerns. Drug use, for instance, drug use, pretty simple. Don't wait for them
to look at you and say, this is what we want. Propose. Hey, I will take drug
tests. I'll take drug tests before every visit. I'll submit to those drug
tests. Whatever I have to do to show the court that is a thing of the past, I
will do it. The best advice I can give someone in this situation though is you
need to be patient.
(28:56):
If you bull in a China shop this and think six months
under my belt, I'm good, give me my child back, you're going to lose. I mean
absent some showing that the dad is now the unstable one you're going to lose.
You are now behind that proverbial eight ball. You now are in that unfortunate
situation where you need to prove yourself, show the court that history is
history. You are a much different person and you are ready to be a healthy
parent and that's going to take some time. I've seen it take over a year. I've
seen it take multiple years, but if you do it the right way, then you're going
to accomplish your goals. Alright, so sort of building on that, here's another
question. Can a parent ask for a mental health evaluation of the other parent
question goes on to say my children's dad and I went through a custody hearing
eight years ago I was dealing with depression and was still going through
postpartum depression.
(30:14):
I took some pills once and that situation was brought up
in court. Dad's lawyer wanted my health records to see if I was a danger to the
children. I didn't sign the HIPAA paperwork in order to allow them to get into
my records. Dad got final legal decision making due to it. We're going through
another custody trial. Now I'm representing myself. My mental health is being
called into question again, dad had had bouts of depression in the past. Is it
possible for me to ask the court to have him submit to a mental health
evaluation? Well, here's the thing. If it comes across as retaliatory, my
opinion is the court's not going to do it. If the father is a pillar of
stability has always been and there's no evidence to show that that has
changed. If they are trying to call into question your mental health and you
turn around and you're like, I'm crazy. Well, he's crazy.
(31:22):
Some courts will do, okay, let's do a mutual psychological
evaluation. A lot of judges aren't going to go that lazy route. Most judges are
going to say, well, hold on one second. Your mental health was correctly called
into question. So what is he doing that would cause the court to have any
concern that maybe he's suffering from mental health challenges? So your
comment is that he basically dealt with some depression himself. Okay, well
what does that mean? What does that look like? What incidents occurred? Because
again, if you're going into court and your defense to his request is simply,
well then I want him to be evaluated also, you're going to lose that argument.
But if you actually have something, if that depression is enough to convince
the court that, Hey, look, I get it. I dealt with some issue years ago, some
issues years ago and I understand and he's now asking for me to be evaluated,
fine, but judge, let's look at his behavior.
(32:52):
Let's look at his mental health because it cuts both ways.
He's saying, I'm concerned about mom, I'm saying I'm concerned about dad and
this is why and this is what happened. Now it doesn't look retaliatory. Now
you're basically saying, look, if we're going to deal with the psychological
issues, let's deal with them. Let's make sure both of us are healthy. That's
how I would approach that. And when we come back, I'm going to talk about legal
rights in a home 40 year marriage and one spouse is suddenly saying, well, it's
in my name. Get out. I'm not sure the law is going to support that, but we'll
go into it when we come back.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
I just wanted to let you know that if you ever wanted to
listen to the show live, you can listen at 1:00 AM on Monday mornings on WSB.
So you can always check us out there as well.
Speaker 1 (33:53):
Better than like counting sheep, I guess, right? Right.
You can turn on the show and we'll help you fall asleep.
Speaker 2 (34:00):
There you go. I'll talk
Speaker 1 (34:01):
Very soft.
(34:07):
Welcome back everyone to Divorce Team Radio, a show
sponsor by the Divorce and Family Law firm of Merriwether and Tharp. I'm your
host, Todd Orton. If you want to read more about us, check us out
online@atlantadivorceteam.com. You want to read transcripts, listen to shows,
find them@divorceteamradio.com. Also, just wanted to remind you that if you
want to listen to the show live, you can listen at 1:00 AM on Monday mornings
on WSB. Okay? So answering questions today and not just questions about life. I
mean legal questions relating to family law and divorce and custody and you
name it and I'm going to keep doing that. And here it's an unfortunate
situation. I mean they're all unfortunate to one degree or another, but the
question is, my father has been married for about 40 years and their home is in
the wife's name. What is his legal rights to staying in the home? My elderly
father has been married for 40 plus years and purchased his current home about
30 years ago with his wife. The home was placed in the wife's name. She's
experiencing some mental paranoia and is now threatening to throw my father out
of the home since the home is in her name. What legal right does he have to
stay in the home?
(35:35):
Well, again, talking about Georgia law, eviction rights
and laws kind of go out the window when you're dealing with marital property,
and that's what we're talking about here. This is a marital home and therefore
she can't just kick him out. And again, I can't speak to every jurisdiction,
but here in Georgia that wouldn't fly. It doesn't matter that the property is
only, let's assume it's only in her name. It doesn't matter that he did that.
It is still marital property and at the very least, the court has to make a
determination as to whether or not he has an ownership interest, what that
interest looks like. So she cannot just say get out.
(36:42):
If she calls the police and says, Hey, here you go. Here
you go. I mean, here's the legal document that shows that it was transferred
into my name. The police should be looking at her or whomever and say, well,
hold on one second. You guys are married. 40 plus year marriage, that's a civil
matter. Take it up with the court and no attorney is going to deal with this in
terms of an eviction that would get, I believe, shut down immediately. So while
I'm not concerned about can he just be pushed out of the home, my concern
becomes the mental health component. And basically, is this heading towards a
divorce?
(37:45):
Is her mental health going to make living together just
impossible? The question is, can he be pushed out of the home? And my question
becomes, can he safely stay in the home? How bad is her mental health? If she
suddenly accepts that he isn't just going to leave and she can't just kick him
out, what will she do or say? Will she make claims file some kind of a
protective order to try and have him removed? This is a moment where, and I
hate it, I hate it after four years, let alone 40. But this is where he needs
to be deciding is this marriage and continuing in this marriage, is it going to
work? Or has her mental health gotten to a point where it's just not even safe
for him to be in the same home, let alone in a marriage with her? Next
question. How can my ex and I drop our attorneys and file the final draft of
our agreed modification that my attorney put together? The person goes on to
write at the start of this modification, two years ago, my ex and I had
horrible communication that has since changed greatly. Communication and
co-parenting is better than it has ever been. We would both like to release our
attorneys to end the, it says revolving bills and file the final draft on our
own.
(39:31):
So the question, how can my ex and I drop our attorneys
for the most part, pretty simple. You need to just send a communication to your
attorney saying, I no longer need your services. Please stop all work on my
case. Now understand that doesn't mean they are no longer your attorney yet
because an attorney has to be released from the case, the judge needs to sign
an order that releases the attorney from the case. So here would be my
suggestion, and I'm not saying it as an attorney trying to say things to benefit
other attorneys. I understand what's going on here. You feel like you have been
in essence bleeding in terms of all the costs and you want to put an end to it.
But here's the thing, if you really have reached an agreement, then regain
control over your attorney.
(40:55):
Contact the attorneys. Basically both of you talk to your
respective attorneys, give them the same messaging, come up with whatever the
terms are, provide it to one of the attorneys, let's say wife, wife. Contact
your attorney. Hand them the sheet that both you and the husband have agreed
upon all those terms and say, this is what the agreement will say. Go ahead,
draft it up please. That's all I need you to do. Let them draft it up, make
sure it's correct. Both of you can then agree and submit everything. And yes,
will there be some additional cost? Yes, but you know it's going to be done. It
should be done correctly. You don't have to deal with all of the stress of
firing the attorneys and getting that approved by the court and then doing
everything on your own. And maybe you don't know what to do and maybe you don't
do it correctly.
(41:52):
So that's another way to look at it. But it really comes
down to regaining some level of control in your relationship with your
attorney. It's been pending for two years. In my mind. That's crazy. I don't
know the issues in the case, so I'm not saying that anyone did anything wrong,
but two years, that doesn't happen all the time. But if you've reached an
agreement, then maybe what you need to do, instead of just saying, I just want
to fire the attorneys, is take control of that relationship and hand them the
terms. Here it is, draft it up and let the attorneys then get you over that
finish line the right way. Alright, with the time we have left, I want to go
over this question. The question is, what can I do if the mediator forgot to
put a disagreement in the paperwork, went to mediation.
(42:55):
I didn't notice until afterwards that the mediator did not
put that the party and I disagreed on last name. I would like the hyphenation
and the other party doesn't. The other party agreed to joint legal decision
making but did not agree to 50 50 parenting time. And that is in the paperwork.
I would like for the judge to see all of these disagreements. Okay, this, I
love mediators. I do. I'm a trained mediator. I believe in the process. I have
worked with some incredible mediators who they have done, I mean obviously they
know as much as attorneys. I get it, but they're not attorneys. Some of them
are, but oftentimes they're not. And more to the point, even if they are as
knowledgeable, they don't represent parties. The problem is to save money. I've
seen people go to mediation and think that that mediator is just going to, in
essence, kind of walk that line and represent both of them and help everything
get into the agreement that the parties can then sign and be done.
(44:17):
The problem is they may not be an attorney. BI don't know
how good they are. And C, it's not their job to protect either one of you and
to make sure everything that needs to be in there is in there. And this is what
happens sometimes and things get missed or they're not put in correctly.
Unfortunately, depending on the laws in your jurisdiction, there may not be
anything you can do. It's a binding agreement here in Georgia. You do have a
short period of time, a short window, to basically withdraw your consent. But
once it's done, it's done. And you know what else has done the show? Hopefully
these questions help you or somebody. Thanks so much for listening.